Leaving it for a year is not a bad idea, by then the software might be better. To use a Windows analogy, the FVP-4000T software has just about progressed from Windows Vista to Windows Vista SP1: Windows 7 is still over the Horizon. Humax do seem to have dropped the build quality though. External PSU, cheap and nasty. No front display, cheap and nasty. Why did they drop DLNA streaming of high def. content? Was this cost related or were they worried that it could be used to access a decrypted high def. stream?
My Humax Forum » Freeview HD » FVP 4000T, 5000T
Return to HDR Fox T2
(13 posts)-
| Sat 13 Aug 2016 15:10:48 #11 |
-
It is because so much functionality has not been implemented. The Fox T2 had much of it right. It just needed updating and prettifying. On a thread on here much of what is missing in the Firmware was discussed.
https://myhumax.org/forum/topic/update-10125-any-real-improvements
It was all in the T2. The only way to make customers happy is to add to what they have experienced. The 4000T feels like a retro grade it terms of Firmware. Even now they are starting to struggle to find beta testers. Why, because there has been no announcement as to what will be addressed based on the feedback on here. Is there a plan?
| Sat 13 Aug 2016 16:33:32 #12 | -
Ironic that there is still always a picture of the Fox HDR T2 in the top right hand corners of all the FVP 4000T forum pages...
| Sat 13 Aug 2016 16:47:55 #13 |
Reply
You must log in to post.
