dragnil - 1 hour ago » I'm about to return to the old method of padded recording but that would be silly if I've missed something because the concept of AR looks so good.
When I first had mine, I set it up with padding, but that caused all sorts of problems - so I decided to remove the padding, and it has always worked perfectly for me without. I can't comment on why you missed bits of programmes but, as I say, mine have been ok.
With padding, you get conflicts if you try to record two back-to-back programmes on the same channel because the bits of padding overlap - and it says it can't do it. I seem to recall that what it actually does is to carry on recording the first programme through the padding period, and then starts the second programme late. It has, of course, recorded both programmes - but the start of the second one is in the wrong file!
So my conclusion is that the disavantages of padding outweigh the advantages.
WT
| Sun 22 Jan 2012 20:09:33
#17 |