Bughtlin - 26 minutes ago »
more audience for C5 than Spike. If it was spike, that would go behind a pay wall. audience is so low it wouldn't pay the fee to put the technicians light on to put in so many repeats...
There's lots of scope for Spike content to improve, should Viacom wish to go down that road.
C5 HD is already behind a pay wall - no obvious reason for Viacom to want to change that, but again, it depends what their strategy is.
Then again - it's been suggested elsewhere that they may just be cutting costs by moving C5 HD from Sky capacity to Viacom capacity. Which may be more likely than either Spike HD or a liberated C5 HD. I guess we'll soon find out.
| Fri 18 Dec 2015 11:45:54
#8 |