grum - 11 hours ago »
PS. sorry, couldn’t resist answering this argument...
Currently 971 channels, and you imagine that can be delivered to your home over broadband, Add up the total bitrate, the first 3 transponders add up to about 100Mb/second.
So you believe that to receive 971 channels via broadband, the bandwidth required would be the total: I’ll be generous so let’s say 2Mbs per channel x 971 would require a 2Gbs connection. Reality check, nobody watches 971 channels at once - not even ‘The Man Who Fell To Earth’ :-).
Here’s a simple analogy - when I watch a video on YouTube I don’t need the bandwidth to receive all 7 billion, just the one I’m watching.
You might not need it but you aren't alone if all Sky subscribers and Freesat FTA users went on to IP delivery the internet simply couldn't cope.
There's a big difference in playing a selected stream from a distant server to being able to provide live TV access to all the channels you are capable of viewing.
I have Two Freesat + boxes, Two Freeview+ boxes, One Freeview Play unit and a twin tuner Vbox IP server.
That's the capability to record 12 HD streams at once and a grandson who uses Netflix all the time, plus watch on live TV channel.
Say an average HD channel bitrate of about 7Mbps.
That's a total of 13 x 7 (= say 5 for Netflix) = 96 Mbps.
| Fri 16 Mar 2018 10:57:39
#33 |